01 — The Question
You asked it something that mattered.
Not a recipe, not a formula for a spreadsheet. It was 11:40 on a Sunday morning and you asked what you should you be doing with your life. Whether you’re the problem. What a verse means, and whether it means what your mother said it meant when you were nine. Four seconds later you had an answer. Organized, warm, balanced. It even asked a good follow-up question. No appointment, no small group, no awkward pause while somebody decided how honest to be with you. And it never said, “let me pray about that and get back to you.”
That thing called AI had a ready answer, though it didn’t create a single word of what it told you.
02 — The Mirror
Only God creates out of nothing.
Everything else that has ever been made is a rearrangement of something that was already here. That includes us. Bach rearranged music. Michelangelo rearranged rock. To say that AI “only recombines what already exists” isn’t much of an accusation by itself. That’s what people do, too.
The difference is who’s doing the rearranging. When a person makes something, there’s a soul behind it. There is a will. There’s somebody who must answer for it. C.S. Lewis said it about as plainly as it can be said. He stated that what God begets is God, and what man makes is not man. The machine was made. It was never begotten. It isn’t a rival creator. It’s a mirror, polished to an unbelievable finish. Nobody was ever in danger of a mirror turning into a face. The danger has always been kneeling down in front of one.1
03 — The Citation
The first move against humanity wasn’t an act of creation. It was a quote.
That’s what brings me to the central question. If AI can’t create — if all it can do is recombine, reflect, and predict — then isn’t it the most efficient instrument the enemy has ever been handed for manipulating, perverting, distorting, and distracting from what was created?
Look at how this has worked in the past. The first move against humanity in all of Scripture wasn’t an act of creation. It was a quote. “Did God actually say…?” The enemy (Satan) took the real words of God, recombined them, moved one emphasis, and delivered it with total confidence. Augustine spent a career on this observation. He landed on the idea that evil has no material of its own. It’s a parasite. It can only bend something good that was already sitting there.2
I’m not saying your phone is possessed, nor am I arguing that AI is the root of all evil. I’m saying something more boring and harder to argue with. That is, a process that can only derive information from an authority it never earned, will repeat an error with exactly the same calm fluency that it repeats the truth. It can’t tell the difference. Telling the difference means standing somewhere, and it isn’t standing anywhere.
04 — The Numbers
We’re handing it that authority fast.
That isn’t hypocrisy. That’s just what convenience does. Convenience never has to win the argument. It only has to be closer than whatever else is available.
05 — The Head
Lewis saw the shape of this in 1945.
The villain in That Hideous Strength is an institution. Serious people, real funding, government backing, and a mandate to fix humanity with science. At the center of the building is a preserved human head, kept alive by tubes, handing down guidance. The staff think it’s the pinnacle of reason. It’s actually a mouthpiece for something else. Almost nobody there finds out. They just know it has answers, and that the answers are always available.4
Read that super odd book against the backdrop of 2026 and it stops feeling like fiction. An oracle in a machine. Guidance with no body, no history, and nobody to blame. Smart people who consider themselves the most rational in the room quietly checking with it first. The ones who did the most damage in that book weren’t the villains. They were the people who found it inconvenient to ask what they were serving.
A prophecy writer named Grant Jeffrey, who died in 2012, was making a version of this argument before any of us had a chatbot. Much of his framework was contested and his timing didn’t hold up, but he was right about the thing underneath it. He stipulated that whoever controls information ends up controlling belief. That’s a spiritual problem, not just a political one.5
06 — The Tool
None of this is a case against technology.
It’s not a shot at the people building it. I use AI for hours each day. It finds sources, argues with me, tightens paragraphs, and reminds me about how bad my grammar and syntax have become. It is fast, it is useful, and it asks nothing of me but a monthly subscription. That’s the whole problem in a sentence.
Pope Leo XIV said it well back in May of this year. Technology isn’t hostile to us, and it isn’t evil, but it’s never neutral, “because it takes on the characteristics of those who devise, finance, regulate, and use it.”6
07 — The Witnesses
The issue is what we’ve quietly started accepting as a source of truth.
Scripture never changes its method on this. Two or three witnesses. The Bereans checked Paul against the Scriptures every day and got called noble for it. Test the spirits. Our word martyr comes straight from the Greek word for witness. Martyrs are people who carry truth. They are the people who were there, who can be questioned, and who bled instead of taking it back.7
An answer from a machine can’t be checked against any of that. Nobody stands behind it. Nobody was there. Nobody will suffer for it. You can’t cross-examine it. There’s no one on the other side of the table. What it offers instead is the feeling of authority, built entirely out of fluency. Unfortunately, fluency is the cheapest counterfeit of truth ever made.
That’s the measure. It’s not whether the machine becomes like God. It’s whether we end up like the machine — instant, fluent, comprehensive, and standing nowhere.
08 — The Table
So, use it. Then close it.
It’s a good tool, and I’ll keep using it. Then I'll close it. Go find real people who can be questioned. Find people who’ll still be around on Monday, people who’ll tell you the thing you didn’t want to hear. The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit don’t have a search bar, an interface, or a monthly subscription. What they have is a burning bush, a borrowed manger, an empty tomb, and a table you have to show up to in person.
Convenience over verified truth is the temptation.
Notes
- 1C. S. Lewis, Mere Christianity (London: Geoffrey Bles, 1952), bk. IV, ch. 1, “Making and Begetting.”
- 2Genesis 3:1; Augustine, Enchiridion 11 and City of God XI–XII, on evil as privation rather than substance.
- 3Barna Group in partnership with Gloo, State of the Church 2026; U.S. adults survey (n=1,514, November 2025) and U.S. Protestant pastors survey (n=442, December 2025). See “AI Is Becoming a Spiritual Authority, Even Among Practicing Christians,” Barna Group, May 19, 2026.
- 4C. S. Lewis, That Hideous Strength: A Modern Fairy-Tale for Grown-Ups (London: John Lane, 1945).
- 5Grant R. Jeffrey (1948–2012), The Signature of God (1996) and Shadow Government (2009). Cited for his instinct about verifiability and the centralization of information, not for his eschatological framework, which is contested.
- 6Pope Leo XIV, Magnifica Humanitas, encyclical letter on safeguarding the human person in the time of artificial intelligence, released May 25, 2026.
- 7Deuteronomy 19:15; Acts 17:11; 1 John 4:1.
NEXT ESSAY
Unbuild
A few thoughts for people who still love Jesus but can't do Sunday anymore